Responses to complaints as restricted activities (book chapter)

Download 92
Total Views 40
File Size 242.63 KB
File Type pdf
Create Date 21st March 2016
Last Updated 27th June 2016

In this chapter I investigate how the staff members of a mental health Therapeutic Community in Italy avoid displays of affiliation in response to residents’ indirect (or third party) complaints. I show how this restriction can be embodied in different practices: ignoring a resident’s turn carrying a possible com- plaint, avoiding attending the complaint-components of a resident’s turn, and disaffiliating with a resident’s complaint. I also discuss a deviant case in which affiliation is produced and is later treated by the staff members as a problematic stance to be produced following a resident’s complaint. I argue that through a restriction on affiliation the staff members implement the institutionally relevant identity of intermediaries, whose task is to encourage the residents’ compliance to the decisions of absent third parties.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *