Version | |
Download | 65 |
Total Views | 28 |
Stock | ∞ |
File Size | 242.63 KB |
File Type | |
Create Date | 21st March 2016 |
Last Updated | 27th June 2016 |
In this chapter I investigate how the staff members of a mental health Therapeutic Community in Italy avoid displays of affiliation in response to residents’ indirect (or third party) complaints. I show how this restriction can be embodied in different practices: ignoring a resident’s turn carrying a possible com- plaint, avoiding attending the complaint-components of a resident’s turn, and disaffiliating with a resident’s complaint. I also discuss a deviant case in which affiliation is produced and is later treated by the staff members as a problematic stance to be produced following a resident’s complaint. I argue that through a restriction on affiliation the staff members implement the institutionally relevant identity of intermediaries, whose task is to encourage the residents’ compliance to the decisions of absent third parties.